Quick Stats

Quick Stats

    You are here

    Could CVS Smokeout Impact Grocery?

    With fewer cigarettes to tax, pols might look to food for new revenue

    By Jim Dudlicek, Stagnito Business Information
    Company estimates it will lose approximately $2 billion in revenue annually as a result.

    The announcement by CVS that it will stop selling tobacco products this fall begs the question: What new taxes are local governments going to come up with now?

    Certainly, the decision to end the sale of cigarettes, cigars and related products seems like a no-brainer for a drug store chain. Larry Merlo, president and CEO of CVS Caremark, calls it "the right thing for us to do for our customers and our company to help people on their path to better health," noting that selling tobacco is "inconsistent with our purpose."

    This will naturally put pressure on Walgreens and other drug retailers to follow suit -- as well as grocers with in-store pharmacies, many of whom are pushing an overall wellness message, complete with retail dietitians and other related health expertise. Logically, the move against cigarettes makes perfect sense for any retailer in the health and wellness business.

    Yeah, So?

    But the move by CVS raises an interesting quandary -- possibly on its own, definitely if the movement snowballs -- for local governments that use higher cigarette taxes as the foundation for shoring up their perpetual financial woes. It's not inconceivable to think that, with fewer places to buy cigarettes making them less convenient to obtain, the downward spiral of smokers -- and thus total tobacco tax receipts -- will pick up speed. These same governments that publicly laud a reduction in smoking as a boon to health will be cursing the absence of revenue. (I could go on all day about the two-faced insanity of trying to raise revenue by taxing a product off the market, but no one should be surprised by a two-faced politician).

    It's also going to send lawmakers looking for something else to tax. Hmm ... what else does a grocer sell that we could demonize? The groundwork has already been laid for higher taxes on sugared soft drinks, fatty snacks and other foods deemed unhealthy. In CVS' announcement, Merlo further notes: "As the delivery of health care evolves with an emphasis on better health outcomes, reducing chronic disease and controlling costs, CVS Caremark is playing an expanded role in providing care ..."  As I see it, any foods that can in some way be blamed for bad health and promoting chronic disease will be back in the taxman's crosshairs.

    (Meanwhile, with drug stores out of the game, convenience stores may recapture some of the cigarette sales they've been losing as the number of smokers have dwindled, and replacing those sales with new fresh food initiatives that have given grocers more competition.)

    So as retailers start to jump aboard the no-tobacco bandwagon, watch for governments to ramp up their focus on so-called junk foods, and be ready for them to look beyond as well.

    By Jim Dudlicek, Stagnito Business Information
    • About Jim Dudlicek As editor-in-chief of Progressive Grocer, Jim Dudlicek oversees daily operations of the magazine, spearheads its signature features, produces PG’s monthly Trend Alert newsletter on center store issues, moderates its regular webcast series, and writes and comments about a wide range of grocery issues. A food industry journalist since 2002, Jim came to PG in June 2010 after covering the dairy industry for 7½ years, during which time he served as chief editor of Dairy Field and Dairy Foods magazines. A graduate of Marquette University, Jim is fascinated by how truly progressive grocers inspire consumers to enjoy food, transforming the industry from mere merchants into educators that can take the most basic of all necessities and turn it into something profound and life-enhancing.

    Related Content

    Related Content